The Kerala Technical Education Service Rule 6A Supreme Court judgment resolves the conflict between AICTE qualification norms and state promotion rules, safeguarding prior Supreme Court beneficiaries while preserving remedies for affected non-parties.

The ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Era Infrastructure simultaneous CIRP Supreme Court judgment settles whether creditors must elect between debtor and guarantor, addressing double recovery safeguards and NCLT discretion.

The Supreme Court decision in Bhagyalaxmi Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Babaldas Amtharam Patel surety liability settles how far guarantors remain liable when borrowers exceed sanctioned limits and when partial discharge applies.

The Torrent Power Supreme Court judgment reinforces the primacy of CoC commercial wisdom, holding courts cannot interfere with approved resolution plans absent statutory violations or material irregularity.

In the Lease vs Licence Supreme Court 2026 ruling, the Court restores a 99-year registered lease in Vivekananda Kendra, clarifies the intention test, limits unilateral cancellation, and reinforces lis pendens protection in property disputes.

The Panacea Biotec Supreme Court judgment clarifies when limitation begins in Drugs Act prosecutions and holds that complaints by public servants need not mechanically follow Section 202 CrPC enquiry requirements.

The Sistema Shyam Teleservices Supreme Court judgment clarifies when liability begins after licence cancellation and holds that government delay cannot justify retrospective interest claims.

The Sriganesh Chandrasekaran Supreme Court judgment clarifies that landowners are not automatically liable for construction delays caused by developers. Interpreting JDA and indemnity clauses, the Court held liability depends on contractual allocation of obligations.

The Priyanka Kumari Supreme Court judgment clarifies that employees cannot be punished for degrees obtained from universities later declared invalid. The Court reinstated terminated librarians, balancing equity by denying back wages while preserving service continuity.

The Dinesh Kumar Supreme Court judgment clarifies that welfare societies operating on government land can face Article 226 scrutiny. The Court set aside allotments tainted by favouritism and reaffirmed fiduciary duties of ex officio public officials.

The Parameshwari Supreme Court sentencing judgment clarifies that victim compensation cannot substitute custodial punishment. Restoring the trial court’s sentence, the Court reaffirmed proportionality, deterrence, and reasoned sentencing as core principles of criminal justice.

The Rohit Jangde Supreme Court judgment clarifies the evidentiary limits of Section 27 and reinforces that circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain. The Court set aside conviction citing investigative lapses, partial forensic linkage, and insufficient corroboration.

In a landmark ruling on Supreme Court cement grinding unit reclassification, the Court quashed an unlawful Change of Land Use and set aside CPCB’s downgrade from Red to Orange category. The judgment reinforces strict statutory compliance under the PRTPD Act and strengthens constitutional environmental protections under Article 21.

The Doniyar Vildanov NDPS acquittal Supreme Court judgment highlights how failure to follow mandatory search safeguards and inconsistencies in evidence can collapse prosecution cases under the NDPS Act.

The Ram Singh election case Supreme Court ruling highlights how appellate courts handle election disputes after term expiry and why adverse observations and administrative directions may be set aside when interim stays exist.

The Stem cell therapy for ASD Supreme Court judgment holds that unproven stem-cell treatments for autism cannot be marketed as clinical therapy and must operate only within approved research frameworks.

The Supreme Court’s ruling on UGC Regulations Vice Chancellor appointment standards confirms the overriding force of UGC norms over conflicting university statutes and clarifies remedies when appointments violate regulatory requirements.

The Restoration of Section 138 NI Act complaint Supreme Court decision explains when courts must restore criminal cheque dishonour complaints dismissed for default. The ruling emphasises interest of justice and proper exercise of revisional jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court holds that where an arbitration agreement itself is alleged to be forged, courts must first decide its existence and cannot compel arbitration. The ruling clarifies fraud-based non-arbitrability and curbs misuse of Article 227.

The Supreme Court clarifies the legal limits of de-licensing of land use, reinforces strict pleading standards in writ jurisdiction, and delineates the National Green Tribunal’s role in urban planning disputes.