The Supreme Court condemns the dowry system while cancelling bail in a dowry-death case, stressing that marriage cannot be reduced to a commercial transaction. The Court emphasises statutory presumptions, dying declarations, and strict scrutiny in Section 304B prosecutions.

The Supreme Court rules that a broken promise of marriage in a consensual relationship does not constitute rape. Converting a "sour relationship" into a sexual offence trivialises the gravity of rape laws, as consent was not vitiated by fraud ab initio.

The Supreme Court warns that digital media self-regulation is ineffective and signals the need for an independent regulator. Highlighting rapid virality and harmful content, the Court seeks preventive mechanisms, age verification, and AI-assisted moderation for online platforms.

The Supreme Court acquitted a man, ruling that a forensic match of a weapon is not a "silver bullet". With eyewitnesses turning hostile, the FSL report alone could not prove guilt, especially with a weak recovery and chain of custody gaps.

The Supreme Court affirmed a POCSO conviction based on the victim's "unshaken" testimony, ruling it can outweigh negative medical reports. The Court reinforced the primacy of credible ocular evidence over the absence of physical proof.

The Supreme Court ruled that trial delays are not enough to grant NDPS bail, and the mandatory "twin conditions" of Section 37 must be met. The Court prioritized the statute's strict embargo over general personal liberty arguments.

The Supreme Court ruled that a writ of habeas corpus cannot be used as a "backdoor" to get bail after regular applications have been rejected. The Court called a High Court's order releasing an accused "totally unknown to law".

The Supreme Court ruled that a pending writ petition (Article 226) is no excuse for a time-barred statutory remedy. The Court held that writ jurisdiction cannot rescue a litigant who negligently allowed their appeal rights to expire.

The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court’s order directing the Centre to resume MGNREGA payments in West Bengal, holding that wages under the rural employment scheme are a statutory entitlement and cannot be withheld due to administrative disputes or political differences.

The Supreme Court reaffirmed that State Bar Councils must strictly comply with the ₹750 cap on enrollment fees for advocates, warning that overcharging young lawyers violates statutory provisions under the Advocates Act and undermines access to the legal profession.

The Supreme Court clarified that witness intimidation under Section 195A IPC is a cognizable offence, empowering police to take direct action without prior court approval, and emphasized the need to protect witnesses to ensure fair trial and judicial integrity.

The Supreme Court ruled that investigators cannot search or seize a lawyer’s digital devices without prior judicial approval, emphasizing the need to protect advocate-client privilege and prevent investigative overreach into confidential professional communications.

The Supreme Court restricted the issuance of ex-parte summons to lawyers and reiterated that advocate-client communications are privileged, reinforcing that legal professionals must not be compelled to disclose client information without due judicial process.

A Startling Breach Inside the Courtroom The Supreme Court of India is set to hear, on October 27, a contempt petition filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) against advocate Rakesh Kishore , who allegedly attempted to hurl a shoe at Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai  during open court proceedings earlier this month. The incident, which reportedly occurred during a routine hearing, sent shockwaves through the legal fraternity — a space where decorum, civility, and r

Summary Case:   Laxman Siddappa Naik v. Kattimani Chaniappa Jamappanna & Ors. Citation:  1968 AIR 929; 1968 SCR (2) 805 Date of Judgment:  19 January 1968 Bench:  Hon'ble Justice M. Hidayatullah; Hon'ble Justice S.M. Sikri; Hon'ble Justice K.S. Hegde Advocates:  S. S. Javali and M. Veerappa for the appellant; R. Gopalakrishnan for respondent no.1 Statutory Provisions / Instruments:  Representation of the People Act, 1951 (s.116-A); Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950

The Supreme Court's recent ruling on Vantara, Reliance Foundation's ambitious animal project, brings a decisive close to a chapter of controversy. The court's acceptance of an independent investigation found no wrongdoing in the acquisition of animals, including elephants. This decision moves beyond a simple legal verdict, sparking a broader conversation about private philanthropy, animal welfare, and the balance between vigilance and trust in India.

In a landmark electoral law development, the Supreme Court has ruled that Aadhaar cards are valid for identity verification during Bihar's voter list revision. The bench clarified that while Aadhaar is not proof of citizenship, it qualifies as a standalone identity document under Section 23(4) of the R.P. Act. This ruling aims to enhance electoral participation, particularly for marginalized communities who often face hurdles with documentation.

The Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Union Government and ECI regarding a PIL that seeks stricter rules for political parties. The court will examine if legislative action is required to “ensure transparency, curb criminal influence, and enforce secularism in politics”. This move addresses the increasing opacity in party financing and the criminalization of politics, pushing for greater accountability in democratic governance.

In a move with major implications for India’s digital economy, the Supreme Court has consolidated all High Court petitions challenging the Online Gaming Act, 2025. The Court cited the need for a "unified adjudication" to prevent inconsistent rulings and ensure regulatory certainty. This case will define how the government balances industry innovation, consumer protection, and addiction concerns within the rapidly expanding online gaming sector.